← Search

Brad Kruck

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alameda, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 10W–25L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history35 matches
L
2026-04-02 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raymond Teeling
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-03-23 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Silvani
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-18 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Obrien
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-03 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with SOLOMON CALAPATAN
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-26 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with B Peter Maspaitella
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raymond Teeling
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-02-03 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Shaffer
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-09 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Sverak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-26 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Nolan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-25 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with B Peter Maspaitella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-25 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raymond Teeling
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-20 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Shaffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.2% of games
6.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King