← Search

David Hurlbut

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albany, CA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 51W–135L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history186 matches
L
2026-10-27 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Garry Hurlbut
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-20 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barry Jarvis
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-14 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Garry Hurlbut
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-08 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yoshiharu Kobayashi
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-07 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rory Bannatyne
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-17 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rory Bannatyne
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-04 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Garry Hurlbut
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-20 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Baker
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-12 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Garcia
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-03 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roy Harkow
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-30 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Oliver McClory
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-17 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Garry Hurlbut
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
25.5%
12W–35L · 37.4% of games
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 36.1% of games
6.0
31%
27W–60L · 41.4% of games
6.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 41.6% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 30% of games
6.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 34.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
54 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer