← Search

Trudy Searle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bonita Springs, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 25W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history41 matches
W
2026-03-02 · Sterling Oaks/Giannetta · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-12 · Sterling Oaks/Giannetta · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-03-18 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-03-04 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-02-26 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-02-19 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
2024-02-12 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-22 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-01-15 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-01-08 · Sterling Oaks - Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Flavia Jorge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-08-16 · NEW:Newburyport Blue:Comosa · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alicia Hintlian
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-08-02 · NEW:Newburyport Blue:Comosa · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carey Higham
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 57% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 46.2% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer