← Search

Katy Burke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pendleton, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 45W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history90 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Indy A40 3.5W MON CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Cortwright
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-21 · Indy A40 3.5W MON CSWC Hackney · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Robbins
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · Indy A18 3.5W CSWC Hackney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Robbins
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · Indy A18 3.5W CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Verde
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · Indy A18 3.5W CSWC Hackney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Kaster
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-02 · Indy A18 3.5W MON CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Erskine
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-05 · Indy A18 3.5W MON CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Carpenter
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · CIN C 6.5W CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Huston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-11-08 · CIN C 6.5W CSWC Hackney · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lavon Bustos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-5
L
2025-11-01 · CIN C 6.5W CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Ringo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-04 · CIN C 6.5W CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Scheidler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-06-09 · CIN A18 3.5W CSWC Hackney · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Erskine
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.5% of games
3.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 47.4% of games
6.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.7% of games
7.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal