← Search

Janet Lawrence

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chattanooga, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 74W–94L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history168 matches
L
2026-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Womack championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
Lilly Janecek / Arlene Crampton
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Womack championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Vanvalkinburgh championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Boyd championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-19 · Lovelady · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eileen Long
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Phillips mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Phillips mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Miller/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Reagan championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-13 · Miller/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Miller championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Miller/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Miller championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · Miller/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Miller championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · Sorrow · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Sorrow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 58% of games
3.5
35.9%
23W–41L · 44.7% of games
6.5
56.7%
17W–13L · 56.4% of games
7.5
28%
7W–18L · 42.1% of games
3.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 51% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams