← Search

Lorna Kim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Canada, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
397 matches · 228W–169L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history397 matches
W
2026-09-18 · Besties/Carter-Frick/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Newsome Moltz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-13 · SGV Flint Tri-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Perrigue
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Flint Mix- Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA 4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Lathrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · SGV Flint Tri-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irina Abadzheva
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindi Carter
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mindy Schiffman
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · SGV Flint Foxpack-Kim-Flint Canyon/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · Besties/Carter/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Perrigue
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Sierra
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-08 · Besties/Carter/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Li
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Monica Mitchell
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · SGV Flint Foxpack-Kim-Flint Canyon/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Perry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams136 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.1%
141W–66L · 56.5% of games
4.5
22.2%
12W–42L · 38.5% of games
8.0
73%
27W–10L · 58.3% of games
9.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.4% of games
0.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 58.7% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
46.6%
27W–31L · 50.5% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
133 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
100 matches
#1 Singles
6%
23 matches
#2 Singles
4%
16 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert