← Search

LINH LEE

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Temple City, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 138W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history203 matches
W
2026-10-17 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine M Liu
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-04 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seeun Mok
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Lee
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Lee
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-05 · SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Whitney Johnson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-18 · SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deann McCormick
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · SGV Librarians-Truong-WN/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Reid Hirata mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Whitney Johnson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arroyo High-SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenniffer Wong
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · SGV Librarians-Truong-WN/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenniffer Wong championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jasmine M Liu championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
94.7%
18W–1L · 67.6% of games
3.5
67.6%
75W–36L · 56.6% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.8%
26W–19L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 57.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
41 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams