← Search

Justin Lee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Temple City, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 60W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history96 matches
W
2026-10-24 · SGV TroubbleMakers-Nepomuceno-Live Oak Park/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simon Tieu
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · SGV TroubbleMakers-Nepomuceno-Live Oak Park/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Yeung
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · SGV TroubbleMakers-Nepomuceno-Live Oak Park/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jimmy Tang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · SGV Trouble Maker-Lee-WN/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matthew Hui
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
Default
2026-07-18 · SGV Trouble Maker-Lee-WN/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noel Nepomuceno
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-07-04 · SGV LLW Trouble Maker-Lee-WN/SA10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · SGV LLW Trouble Maker-Lee-WN/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Nieblas
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-13 · SGV Trouble Maker-Lee-Arroyo HS/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Le
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · SGV Librarians-Truong-WN/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with LINH LEE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · SGV Trouble Maker-Lee-Arroyo HS/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Le
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · SGV LLW Trouble Makers -Lee-Arroyo HSSA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vic Kan championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-15 · SGV LLW Trouble Makers -Lee-Arroyo HSSA10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Yin championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 56% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.7% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 82.8% of games
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.9% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 30.3% of games
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.3%
19W–12L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams