← Search

Diane Rusu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Harrison Twp, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 162W–144L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history306 matches
L
2026-10-04 · PEACH-Gaines 7.0 X 55&0 F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gilbert Galicia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Deane championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Deane championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-25 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Deane championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Deane championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Zapytowski championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Deane
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-26 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Deane
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Deane
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · PEACH-Parrott 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Luke
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rochelle Deane
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · BT-Belleau-Mills 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Zapytowski
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
46W–46L · 52.1% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 49% of games
6.0
60%
9W–6L · 55% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.5% of games
7.0
58.3%
42W–30L · 53.5% of games
7.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.7% of games
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 53.1% of games
7.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
61.1%
22W–14L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
122 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
74 matches
#3 Singles
4%
12 matches
Singles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe