← Search

Sandy Shipper

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
W Bloomfield, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 29W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history67 matches
L
2026-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Cundy championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · SCWB-Winer 55s 6.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Vorce
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · SCWB-Mathis 65s 6.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Rubin
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · SCWB-Winer 55s 6.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynn Cundy
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · SCWB-Winer 55s 6.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Faye Heller
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · SCWB-Mathis 65s 6.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Rubin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · SCWB-Mathis 65s 6.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Caroline Lesnau
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · SCWB-Winer 55s 6.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Sweet
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
Kim Marschik / Deb Rutzky
2025-10-26 · 1SCWB-MATHIS 60DW FRI 65&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Barreiro championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
Marsha Friedli / Diane Holland
2025-10-26 · 1SCWB-MATHIS 60DW FRI 65&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Bay championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-15 · 1SCWB-MATHIS 60DW FRI 65&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rita Sharma
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-07-30 · 3SCWB-WINER 60DW WE 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanae Ohashi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 46.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
55%
22W–18L · 51.6% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams