← Search

Laura Eilers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simsbury, CT
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 19W–53L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history72 matches
L
2024-04-07 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Traceski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-10 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Traceski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-02-18 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Traceski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-04 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucy Ferriss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-04-30 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Walsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
W
2023-04-23 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2023-04-16 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Walsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-02-26 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Vaughn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-01-22 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-04-24 · BTC:HighFives:Wood/Dulz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Pollack
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-04-23 · SIMS:All In:Ort · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Vaughn
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-03-27 · BTC:HighFives:Wood/Dulz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Pollack
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2024
BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh
2024 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1/7 · 55+
2024
BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh
2023 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1/7 · 55+
2023
BTC:HighFives:Wood/Dulz
2022 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women 1/7 · 55+
2022
SIMS:All In:Ort
2022 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women · 18+
2022
SIMS:All In:Ort/Hiscox
2022 NCT Adult 40 & Over Day Women · 3.5 Women · 40+
2022
BTC:HighFives:Wood/Dulz
2021 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women Div 1/8 · 55+
2021
SIMS:All In:Hiscox/Ort
2021 NCT Adult 40 & Over Day Women · 3.5 Women 1/7 · 40+
2021
SIMS:All In:Volanski/Whalen
2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women · 18+
2021
SIMS:Bangers and Smash:Stockwell
2021 NCT Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed · 18+
2021
SIMS:Stockwell
2021 NCT Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 40 & Over Mixed · 40+
2021
SIMS:Tennis the Menace:Lee/Robbins
2021 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women Div 1/4 · 55+
2021
BSF:Overserved:Leon/Robbins
2020 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.0 Women · 18+
2020
BTC:High Fives:Wood/Dulz
2020 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women Div 1/9 · 55+
2020
SIMS:All In:Hiscox
2020 NCT Adult 40 & Over Day Women · 3.5 Women Div 1/8 · 40+
2020
SIMS:All In:Volanski/Whalen
2020 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women · 18+
2020
SIMS:Tennis the Menace:Philbrick/Baldassarre
2020 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women Div 1/5 · 55+
2020
SIMS;Bangers & Smash;Stockwell
2020 NCT Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed · 18+
2020
SIMS;Whacqued;Leon
2020 NCT Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 40 & Over Mixed · 40+
2020
SIMS:All In:Volanski
2019 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.5 Women Div 1/10 · 18+
2019
SIMS:All In:Volanski/Whalen
2019 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women · 18+
2019
SIMS:Tennis the Menace:Philbrick
2019 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women Div 1/6 · 55+
2019
SIMS;Bangers & Smash;Stockwell
2019 NCT Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 18 & Over Mixed · 18+
2019
Sims;Bangers and Smash;Stockwell
2019 NCT Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 40 & Over Mixed · 40+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
27.8%
10W–26L · 44.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 44.3% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 61% of the time
#3 Doubles
61%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe