← Search

Mary Fuller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Suffield, CT
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 25W–45L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-07-12 · FV:Break Point:Franklin/Rutigliano · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Rappaport
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-04-26 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Smyth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Tobiasz
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-3
L
2026-02-15 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Smyth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Smyth
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-09 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Fuller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathi Hefler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-10 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberli Treadwell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-04-21 · FV:Over Served:Fuller/Keppel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberli Treadwell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
2024-03-10 · FV:Over Served:Fuller/Keppel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathi Hefler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-03-03 · FV:Over Served:Fuller/Keppel · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Keppel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-01-14 · FV:Over Served:Fuller/Keppel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Keppel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-05-07 · FV:Over Served:Fuller/Keppel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Smyth
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2023-03-19 · FV:Over Served:Fuller/Keppel · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Keppel
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2023-03-16 · FV:Valley Racquettes:Keppel/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Coolidge
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
26.3%
10W–28L · 44.6% of games
7.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova