← Search

Paula Smyth

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Hartford, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 68W–61L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history129 matches
L
2026-03-15 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Smyth · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Petersen
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-08 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Smyth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Giannoni
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-15 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Smyth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Fuller
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Smyth · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberli Treadwell
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Smyth · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberli Treadwell
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-5
L
2025-05-18 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judi Levin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-03-23 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Fuller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judi Levin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-03-09 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judi Levin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-5
W
2025-02-23 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Fuller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Keppel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-12-08 · FV:OverServed:Keppel/Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judi Levin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5
L
2024-05-16 · FV:Get a Grip:Espeso/Hoffman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Petersen
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-09 · FV:Get a Grip:Espeso/Hoffman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 60.7% of games
3.5
43.5%
27W–35L · 47.8% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.1% of games
7.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal