← Search

Catherine Fallin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RICHMOND, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
293 matches · 127W–166L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history293 matches
W
2026-10-03 · RCC Ames · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-10-03 · RCC Ames · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-02 · RCC Ames · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine McGehee
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Gromling
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine McGehee
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Harmon
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Gromling
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · 11 Raintree Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine McGehee
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.5% of games
4.0
43.3%
42W–55L · 48.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 52.8% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.7% of games
8.0
38.6%
22W–35L · 44.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 49.8% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.6%
20W–27L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
123 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
112 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
54 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova