← Search

Shirine Faris

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 111W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history146 matches
W
2026-10-24 · 4.0 TER1 Terravita W55F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronica Fuller
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-18 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-11 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Fridley
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-04 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Quinlan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-27 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Quinlan
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Mosley
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · Fridley/Goldmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Fridley
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Fridley/Goldmann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · Fridley/Goldmann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathy Wilson championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-04 · 8.0 TER Terravita W55S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darcy Antonellis
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-03-27 · 4.0 MTC Nelson W18Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Keller
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 74.1% of games
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 65.7% of games
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 59.4% of games
4.0
73.7%
42W–15L · 59.1% of games
8.0
75%
18W–6L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#1 Singles
11%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert