← Search

Lara Murphy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Phoenix, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 12W–5L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history17 matches
W
2026-10-21 · 4.0 PTC1 Tracey Stone W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Serena Unrein
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · 4.0 PTC1 Tracey Stone W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Ashman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · 4.0 PTC1 Tracey Stone W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shay Kos
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-28 · 4.0 PTC Tracey Stone W18Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Montez
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-04-18 · 4.0 PTC Tracey Stone W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Juhl championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · 4.0 PTC Tracey Stone W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Juhl championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-20 · 4.0 PTC Tracey Stone W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Serena Unrein
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-0, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · 4.0 PTC Tracey Stone W18Sam · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Crownhart
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-27 · 4.0 PTC Tracey Stone W18Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camilla Harrison
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-13 · 4.0 PTC Tracey Stone W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Juhl
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-08 · 8.5 PHO Champagne Tue PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Champagne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-10 · 8.5 PHO Champagne Tue PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cheri Quesenberry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
90%
9W–1L · 62.4% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams