← Search

Nancy Selph

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NAPA, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 63W–79L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history142 matches
L
2026-10-10 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Brummitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-03 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Brummitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-27 · CRANE PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Magaly Otero
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-13 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Brummitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Yates mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Searight
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Myers
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Lauren
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Collins
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-22 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deirdre Burke
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-14 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sennott
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Sennott
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
26.5%
9W–25L · 44% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 54.4% of games
7.5
44%
11W–14L · 47.7% of games
8.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 56.2% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
21.1%
4W–15L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert