← Search

Kathrine Cole

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fairfield, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 65W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history90 matches
W
2026-10-31 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Blanchard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-24 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Angela Merola
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-18 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeri Noveras mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-11 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Manelia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-04 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Manelia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeri Noveras mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeri Noveras mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-19 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Vice
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-13 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maribel Barajas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · IN-SHAPE: VACAVILLE BROWNS VAL CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Angela Merola
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with J Isabel Yanez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Lourens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.5
78.3%
36W–10L · 60.9% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.3% of games
8.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.4% of games
9.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.8% of games
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 76.5% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
38 matches
#1 Singles
32%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer