← Search

Ria Nickens

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Moraga, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 59W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-10-31 · MORAGA CC CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Molly Harcos Tamariki
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-30 · MORAGA CC CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Means
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-26 · MORAGA CC CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryn Strong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-24 · MORAGA CC CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Hunter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · MORAGA CC CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bryn Strong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · MORAGA CC CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Waterbury
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · MORAGA CC CW8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Molly Harcos Tamariki
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-05 · ST MARY 40MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Nichols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · ST MARY 40MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kunal Jain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · MORAGA CC 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Lieberman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · MORAGA CC 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christy Belcastro
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-13 · MORAGA CC 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Harcos Tamariki
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 83.3% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 67.2% of games
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.7% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.9% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 44.6% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 45.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Singles
24%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King