Search

Matt Newton

Tacoma, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
49 matches · 30W–19L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 3.5
23 of 70
WA · 3.5
775 of 1460

Matt is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202220252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Matt has gone from the 82nd to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 64% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 61.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 65.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Gerritzen
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 30% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Diana Chan / Stephen Coates-Whitemixed
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Gerritzen
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Anders Cramer / Adam Cramer
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Riggin
0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Mollie Gosselin / Eric Colemixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Gerritzen
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Angela Boice / Travis Wrightmixed
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jillian Strayer
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Carl Toews / Nicholas Toglia
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Jackson
0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Jason Dyer / Kevin Mense
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Williamson
+0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
YongA Hassig / Chris Cuevasmixed
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Gerritzen
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Cedric Bella / Keinan Paulino
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Christensen
+0.008about as expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Toline
0.022below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Anders Cramer / Adam Cramer
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Bien
+0.046better than expected — took 52% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
David Larsen / Anvesh Uppalapati
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Young Park
+0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.