← Search

Gretchen Earnshaw

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Huntersville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 134W–111L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history245 matches
L
2026-10-08 · LSAR-Armstrong/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Martine Maness
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-05 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shumbriar Ostapko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-01 · LSAR-Armstrong/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Shaw
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-15 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Labar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Dugan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-09-10 · LSAR-Armstrong/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Shaw
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · LGEA-Earnshaw/Skybrook · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Napier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-27 · LSAR-Armstrong/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leah Terry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Earnshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Earnshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Earnshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-14 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Earnshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.8% of games
3.5
53.7%
44W–38L · 50.7% of games
4.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 50.3% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 52.6% of games
6.5
67.2%
39W–19L · 56.6% of games
7.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 45.2% of games
3.5mixed
10%
1W–9L · 31.1% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert