← Search

Emma Pixley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simpsonville, SC
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 45W–22L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history67 matches
L
2026-10-26 · UPTA (A) 9.5W 18 & Over (Pixley) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Sara Hudgens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · UPTA (A) 9.5W 18 & Over (Pixley) · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Cali Rusk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-24 · UPTA (A) 9.5W 18 & Over (Pixley) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Cali Rusk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-24 · UPTA (A) 9.5W 18 & Over (Pixley) · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Julia Fulbright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · FTA18C/HollyTree/Pixley · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Naomi Kozawa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · FTA18C/HollyTree/Pixley · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Naomi Kozawa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · UPTA (A) 5.0W 18 & Over (Sherman) · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jessica Vest
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · UPTA (A) 5.0W 18 & Over (Sherman) · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amanda Sherman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · UPTA (A) 5.0W 18 & Over (Sherman) · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Curran Carver
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · WNC Qualifying Team · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amanda Sherman
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-16 · WNC Qualifying Team · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Zoe Campbell
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-10-05 · FTA18C/HollyTree/Pixley · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cali Rusk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56% of games
4.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 71.7% of games
4.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.9% of games
5.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.2% of games
8.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 66.4% of games
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 47.6% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer