← Search

Sara Hudgens

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simpsonville, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 55W–14L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history69 matches
L
2026-10-26 · UPTA (A) 9.5W 18 & Over (Pixley) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Emma Pixley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · UPTA (A) 9.5W 18 & Over (Pixley) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Liza Feniger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · UPTA (A) 9.5W 18 & Over (Pixley) · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jessica Vest
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-25 · FTA 4.5W 40 & Over (Jain) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liza Feniger championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · FTA 4.5W 40 & Over (Jain) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dorie Fann championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-3
W
2026-07-24 · FTA 4.5W 40 & Over (Jain) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liza Feniger championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-05 · UPTA18M/Beckerle/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brett Brading mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-1
W
2026-06-21 · UPTA18M/Beckerle/HollyTree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackson Dozier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Milne championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Hesketh championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · FTA 4.5W 40 & Over (Jain) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liza Feniger championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · FTA 4.5W 40 & Over (Jain) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liza Feniger championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
84.8%
28W–5L · 69.3% of games
8.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.6% of games
9.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert