← Search

Cynthia Holland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Norwalk, CT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 35W–28L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history63 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Stanwich Country Club - 55+ 9.0 W · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Grainger Hobbins
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-24 · Stanwich Witches 55 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kimelle McCarthy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-01 · Stanwich Witches 55 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Bornstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-06-17 · Stanwich Witches 55 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Dardis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7
L
2024-08-01 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patricia VanTassel-Cromie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-5
L
2024-07-16 · Stanwich · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sandra Eddy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2024-06-27 · Stanwich · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Dardis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-06-13 · Stanwich · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sandra Eddy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-05-21 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sandra Eddy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-11-18 · NHH:Slice of Life:Carroll/Eddy · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Dardis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-11-12 · NHH:Slice of Life:Carroll/Eddy · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sandra Eddy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-07-31 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sandra Eddy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 55.6% of games
9.0
57.6%
19W–14L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams