← Search

Patricia VanTassel-Cromie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Allendale, NJ
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 7W–15L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history22 matches
L
Carol Levine / Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp
2026-06-18 · Stanwich Country Club - 55+ 9.0 W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Daniela Pino
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-07 · Stanwich Country Club - 55+ 9.0 W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Abigail Burke
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-15 · Stanwich Witches 55 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Bornstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-05 · Stanwich Witches 55 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracey Tuthill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-08-01 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Holland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-5
L
2024-07-25 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Bornstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-27 · Stanwich · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Abigail Burke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-13 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Dardis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-08-01 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Bornstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-07-11 · Stanwich · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Dardis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-05 · Stanwich · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Holland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2022-07-12 · Stanwich · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Abigail Burke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe