← Search

Camille Lamoureux

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 19W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
L
2026-04-01 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lorna Matthew
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-04 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Kaump
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-28 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carole Huntley
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-21 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & M Maloney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Kaump
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-20 · CV-IWTG/Tammy Pronenko · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Dyson
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-23 · CV-IWTG/Tammy Pronenko · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Tanking
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-02-12 · CV-Mission Hills/Evans · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Manuela Andrews
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-02-05 · CV-Mission Hills/Evans · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Devereaux
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-02-21 · CV-Mission Hills CC/Evans · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Dudley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-31 · CV-Mission Hills CC/Evans · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Patton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-24 · CV-Mission Hills CC/Evans · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Patton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-11-03 · CV-Palm Desert TC/Iseman · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pam Stafford
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.2% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0
40%
6W–9L · 46% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal