← Search

Landon Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 62W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-09-29 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Enea John Dervishi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-17 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-15 · Pinter/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Boston McClain
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · Pinter/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pablo Sanchez Soria
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · Adams/Wittenberg/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Ramsay
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Adams/Wittenberg/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Barnes
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick O'Keefe championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Raines championship
loading the estimate
1-0, 0-0
L
2026-06-13 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Raines championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Raines championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-04 · Shaver/Pinter/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Raines
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derrick Wilson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 55% of games
4.0
43.4%
23W–30L · 47.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
36.4%
12W–21L · 45.8% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe