← Search

Javid Lateef

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Riverview, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 38W–124L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-10-10 · Buckhorn/Torres · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Scott
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-13 · Buckhorn/Torres · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Dikmen
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-29 · Buckhorn Just Buck(horn) it!!/Seitzinger · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Felipe Guacache
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · Buckhorn Just Buck(horn) it!!/Seitzinger · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Josh Bohnart
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-25 · Buckhorn The Average Joes/Setizinger · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maurice Steenland
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Buckhorn/JustBuckIt/Seitzinger · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with CARLOS Ramirez
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-15 · Hills/Torres/TriLevel18&Over4.5/4.0/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiran Dwarakanath Mane
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-11-08 · Hills/Torres/TriLevel18&Over4.5/4.0/3.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Barrett
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-10-26 · Hills/Torres/TriLevel18&Over4.5/4.0/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiran Dwarakanath Mane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2025-10-12 · Hills/Torres/TriLevel18&Over4.5/4.0/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Beare
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-19 · Buckhorn Springs Just Buck(horn) it - J. Torres · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Orr
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-12 · Buckhorn Springs Just Buck(horn) it - J. Torres · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Orr
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 58.9% of games
4.0
16.2%
13W–67L · 37.2% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 20.4% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
23.1%
6W–20L · 43.7% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 40.4% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 34.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer