← Search

Amber Ostrander

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 52W–58L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history110 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Team 9 Candice Ewing/Elizabeth Nevelow 7.5W · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Candice Ewing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-20 · Team 9 Candice Ewing/Elizabeth Nevelow 7.5W · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melany White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Ellis
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Chester
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jana Chester
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hope Heldmar
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-03-07 · Brookhaven/Schmeltz W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliann Barkley
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · Brookhaven/Schmeltz W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evelyn Werbaneth
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-14 · Brookhaven/Schmeltz W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Renwick
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-02-07 · Brookhaven/Schmeltz W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Jacobs
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-31 · Brookhaven/Schmeltz W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Dildy
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-17 · Brookhaven/Schmeltz W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Jacobs
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
49W–49L · 51.9% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova