Candice Ewing
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
330 matches · 200W–130L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history330 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2027
Team 13 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0S
Team 20 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0F
Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0F
Greenhill/Nevelow W4.0S
Greenhill/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0F
Greenhill/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0S
Greenhill/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0S
Greenhill/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0T
Oak Creek/Timothy W4.5F
Scott Anders X9.0
Team 9 Candice Ewing/Elizabeth Nevelow 7.5W
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
67.8%
185W–88L · 56.1% of games
4.5
18.6%
8W–35L · 36.8% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.4% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
165 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
41 matches
#1 Singles
7%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.