← Search

Michelle Hefner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PROSPER, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
253 matches · 129W–124L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history253 matches
L
2026-11-02 · Team 15 Spring Park/Bradley W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-23 · Team 15 Spring Park/Bradley W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-10-21 · Team 11 Bob Day/Young W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · Team 11 Bob Day/Young W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-11 · Team 11 Bob Day/Young W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Zartler
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-27 · Team 11 Bob Day/Young W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-25 · Team 15 Spring Park/Bradley W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-20 · Team 11 Bob Day/Young W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-18 · Team 15 Spring Park/Bradley W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Young
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-11 · Team 15 Spring Park/Bradley W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Williams
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-22 · Team 3 Cheryl Bradley 7.5W · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with MARY DAMKROGER
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · Team 3 Cheryl Bradley 7.5W · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with MARY DAMKROGER
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 66.9% of games
4.0
49.2%
97W–100L · 51% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 51.3% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
62 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova