← Search

Tanya Musick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 104W–39L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history143 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Team 12 Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tory Redington-Chauza
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-16 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nammari
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Sparling
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · Team 12 Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Nammari
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Sparling
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-21 · Team 6 Sarah Sparling 8.5W · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Montgomery
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gale Dunleavy
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-18 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen McCaffrey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kunz
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Rogers
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-23 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Sparling
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-26 · Manuel Lopez/Christine Rogers X8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Hinterlong
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 61.5% of games
4.0
75.7%
84W–27L · 60.2% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 40.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert