← Search

Sarah Sparling

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 99W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Team 12 Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvette Freeman
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Musick
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Rogers
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-11 · Team 2 Oak Creek/Newberg-Musick W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Musick
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · Team 6 Sarah Sparling 8.5W · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Schultz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Northington championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-22 · Team 6 Sarah Sparling 8.5W · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Schultz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Musick
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Whiteway
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kvale championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kvale championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kvale
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 77.7% of games
3.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 64.9% of games
4.0
79.7%
63W–16L · 61% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 46.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams