← Search

Elizabeth Nevelow

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
347 matches · 238W–109L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history347 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Team 13 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Murray
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-23 · Team 20 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Arvanitis
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · Team 13 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candice Ewing
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-16 · Team 20 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Simmons
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-13 · Team 20 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monique Black
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-27 · Team 13 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Trimper
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-18 · Team 20 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monique Black
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-13 · Team 13 Fretz/Nevelow-Ewing W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Flores
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · Team 9 Candice Ewing/Elizabeth Nevelow 7.5W · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Sayah
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-21 · Team 9 Candice Ewing/Elizabeth Nevelow 7.5W · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Sayah
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Murray championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Schober championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
68.6%
201W–92L · 56.4% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 40% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
83.9%
26W–5L · 59.7% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
143 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
47 matches
#1 Singles
13%
46 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova