← Search

Amanda Genise

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 30W–24L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history54 matches
W
2024-03-15 · Steiniger/Kroening 18+MX W24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-03-03 · Fredrickson Winter24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Silich mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-02-23 · Steiniger/Kroening 18+MX W24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-01-26 · Steiniger/Kroening 18+MX W24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-01-07 · Fredrickson Winter24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Silich mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-12-15 · Steiniger/Kroening · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
W
2023-12-01 · Steiniger/Kroening · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-11-17 · Steiniger/Kroening · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-11-12 · Fredrickson ES24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Silich mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-10-29 · Fredrickson ES24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Silich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2023-10-27 · Steiniger/Kroening · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-10-20 · Steiniger/Kroening · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.9% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams