← Search

Steven Nesteby

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Iowa City, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 61W–59L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history120 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Yawalkar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Schnicker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-31 · Ross & Hightshoe: HTRC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-25 · Conway/Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susie Crain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · Childers: Clinton · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Voelker
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-03 · Ross & Hightshoe: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Geerts
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-26 · Childers: Clinton · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Childers
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · Ross & Hightshoe: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Hightshoe
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Croy-Goettel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Steckel
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · Yawalkar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniela McCue mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · IA/Nesteby-Schadler/18&Over3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paolo Marilim championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Yawalkar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenna Houge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · IA/Nesteby-Schadler/18&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paolo Marilim
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.3%
27W–15L · 56.5% of games
4.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 34.6% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
32 matches
Singles
25%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal