← Search

Marybeth Snodgrass

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Nashville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
435 matches · 237W–198L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history435 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Csernovicz
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · Snodgrass/Pershad · #1 Mixed Doubles · 8.0 · with Yash Pershad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-21 · Hermann/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-07 · Hermann/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
Jenna Mangum / Carter Oakley
2026-10-06 · Snodgrass/Pershad · #1 Mixed Doubles · 8.0 · with Yash Pershad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-04 · Snodgrass/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
Jacque Ramsey / Ben Owenell
2026-10-03 · Snodgrass/Pershad · #1 Mixed Doubles · 8.0 · with Yash Pershad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · Snodgrass/Pershad · #1 Mixed Doubles · 8.0 · with Yash Pershad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-08-30 · Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Shelton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Jay Webb / Jason Mullis
2026-08-27 · Hadley Park III-Blue/Pierenkemper · #4 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jon Naglieri
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Pierenkemper mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zack Gonzalez mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 51.3% of games
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 64.8% of games
4.0
63.7%
114W–65L · 54.7% of games
4.5
29.9%
26W–61L · 40.5% of games
7.5
58.6%
17W–12L · 53.7% of games
8.5
46.3%
19W–22L · 49.9% of games
9.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 40.6% of games
4.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 47% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
109 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
61 matches
#2 Singles
13%
55 matches
Singles
6%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova