← Search

Stephanie Feyes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Nashville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 195W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history250 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Smith
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-10-04 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Csernovicz
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-09-13 · Green/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carrie Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Page
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-30 · Green/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-24 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Carbonari
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sharling Grummon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathleen Carbonari
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aya Melhem
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Andrews
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · Burnstein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Feyes
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Smith championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 70.4% of games
3.5
77.8%
28W–8L · 63.4% of games
4.0
81.1%
73W–17L · 63.7% of games
4.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 53.6% of games
6.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 70.7% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.4% of games
8.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 59% of games
4.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 62.5% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 62.8% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
55 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert