← Search

Katie Feyes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Nashville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 181W–102L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history283 matches
W
2026-10-17 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Venessa Seivers
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-04 · Feyes/Yung-Okamoto/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Largen
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-09-13 · Green/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Page
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Largen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · PM - Csernovicz/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeanai Kluge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · Green/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Feyes
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Andrews championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaly Bush championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Jones championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Andrews championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams110 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
3.0
66.7%
24W–12L · 58.1% of games
3.5
63.1%
41W–24L · 56% of games
4.0
62.9%
44W–26L · 57.1% of games
4.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.8% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
81%
17W–4L · 62.4% of games
7.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.4% of games
8.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.2% of games
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67.9% of games
4.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.3% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 74.7% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
91 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
84 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe