← Search

James Jones

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 94W–67L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history161 matches
L
2026-09-13 · CHI E 55M7.0 6.WSC Mills Sun 2 $22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Carlquist
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 65&OM7.0 4.WSC Mills Sun 12 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Mills
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · CDTA S 65&OM7.0 4.WSC Mills Sun 12 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Barry
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · CDTA S 65&OM7.0 4.WSC Mills Sun 12 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Mills
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
Default
2026-04-19 · CDTA W 65&OM7.0 4.Wheat Mills Sun 12 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Esancy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-12 · CDTA W 55&OM7.0 7.Wheat Mills Sun 2 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phil Debuhr
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · CDTA W 65&OM7.0 4.Wheat Mills Sun 12 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Newman
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · CDTA W 55&OM7.0 7.Wheat Mills Sun 2 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ross MacNeill
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-18 · CDTA W 55&OM7.0 7.Wheat Mills Sun 2 $20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David MacK
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-23 · CDTA NP 65&OM7.0 3Wheaton Mills Sun 12 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Newman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-16 · CDTA E 55&OM7.0 5Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Sink
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-02 · CDTA E 55&OM7.0 5Wheaton Mills Sun 2 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Carlquist
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
62%
31W–19L · 52.2% of games
7.0
55.6%
55W–44L · 53.5% of games
8.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams