← Search

Richard McLean

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elmhurst, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
297 matches · 181W–116L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history297 matches
W
2026-10-04 · CHI E 55M7.0 5.NTC Esancy Sun 6:30 $25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hunter Wiggins
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-09-13 · CHI E 55M7.0 5.NTC Esancy Sun 6:30 $25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob King
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Kearny championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · CDTA S 65&OM8.0 2.SBC Gilbertson Tue 7 $27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Costigan
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · CDTA S 55&OM8.0 3.RT Chopp Mon 7 $27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Kearny
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · CDTA S 65&OM7.0 4.WSC Mills Sun 12 $20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Porto
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · CDTA S 55&OM8.0 3.RT Chopp Mon 7 $27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Kearny
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · CDTA S 65&OM8.0 2.SBC Gilbertson Tue 7 $27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Costigan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · CDTA S 65&OM8.0 2.SBC Gilbertson Tue 7 $27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Williams
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-1
L
2026-07-12 · CDTA S 65&OM7.0 4.WSC Mills Sun 12 $20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Porto
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · CDTA S 65&OM7.0 4.WSC Mills Sun 12 $20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Porto
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · CDTA S 65&OM8.0 2.SBC Gilbertson Tue 7 $27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Costigan
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
70.2%
33W–14L · 56.3% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 39.2% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.9%
96W–52L · 57.9% of games
8.0
52.1%
25W–23L · 49.8% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
18W–12L · 56.5% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
66 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova