← Search

Claire Parsons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 30W–58L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history88 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Cochran 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Paul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-07 · Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristin Williamson
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Higgins
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-09 · Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Higgins
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-19 · Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Bair-Epps
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2025-09-25 · Easley 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Fox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-18 · Easley 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janice Gilman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-09 · Milam 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sally Eagleton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-08-28 · Easley 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Fox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-19 · Milam 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sally Eagleton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-31 · Easley 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Fox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-07-10 · Cochran 18+ 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
45.7%
16W–19L · 49.1% of games
4.5
11.1%
2W–16L · 31.2% of games
7.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.8% of games
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.9% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.9% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
13%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams