← Search

Louise Manzella

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
York, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 69W–111L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history180 matches
L
2026-10-23 · Wisehaven - Michels · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeri Myers
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-18 · Wisehaven - Sandhu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Sasaki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-18 · Wisehaven - Lamond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa McCormack
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · Wisehaven - Mumford / Sandhu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-02 · Wisehaven - Sandhu · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Sasaki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Default
2026-09-26 · Wisehaven - Lamond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-25 · Wisehaven - Michels · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeri Myers
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-20 · Wisehaven - Lamond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa McCormack
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · Wisehaven - Michels · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Lamond
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-11 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Crosetto
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
59%
23W–16L · 54.9% of games
4.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 44.6% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
8.0
24%
18W–57L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
51 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams