← Search

Carrie Betteridge

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 177W–78L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history255 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Lanc CC - Betteridge · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Funk
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-30 · Lanc CC - Beans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John D Betteride mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-10-30 · Lanc CC - Betteridge / Spire · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Olivia Funk
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-25 · Lanc CC - Betteridge · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Eby
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-08 · Lanc CC - Betteridge / Spire · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Shelton
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-25 · Lanc CC - Beans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John D Betteride mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-25 · Lanc CC - Betteridge / Spire · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rosana Mann
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Opilo
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Mann
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.1% of games
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 64.3% of games
3.5
69.6%
39W–17L · 61.3% of games
4.0
50%
16W–16L · 51.6% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 56.2% of games
7.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 62.4% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.8% of games
8.0
60%
18W–12L · 56.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
48 matches
#1 Singles
14%
35 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert