← Search

Patricia Lawrence

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
314 matches · 177W–137L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history314 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Davis
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Davis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-10 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Katz
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-11 · Hempfield Hangen Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Katz
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · (CPD) Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Schaufert championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · (CPD) Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Schaufert championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · (CPD) Hempfield - Covell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Davis championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-21 · (CPD) Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Schaufert championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Opilo
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · Hempfield - Covell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Davis
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Hempfield - Covell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Opilo
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Davis
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
56.5%
61W–47L · 52.5% of games
8.0
60.4%
58W–38L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
22W–8L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
34%
16W–31L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
100 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
97 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova