← Search

Diana Yeagley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 86W–125L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history211 matches
L
2026-10-30 · Hempfield - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nina Beecher
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-23 · RCW - Sumar/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ariff Sumar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-22 · Hempfield - Scott · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Hess
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-16 · Hempfield - Hufnagel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Athey
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · Hempfield - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nina Beecher
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · RCW - Sumar/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ariff Sumar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jody Wilson championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-21 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jody Wilson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Sambrick championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · RCW - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Seabra
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · RCW - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bonnie Weaver
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jody Wilson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
42.3%
33W–45L · 48.7% of games
8.0
48.1%
25W–27L · 50.3% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
39.7%
23W–35L · 48% of games
9.0mixed
25%
5W–15L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
58 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert