← Search

Brittini Thacker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elizabethton, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 35W–23L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history58 matches
W
2026-09-26 · Janiszewski-Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Betancourt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-16 · Janiszewski-Betancourt/META · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Betancourt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-08 · Janiszewski-Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barb Janiszewski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-07-15 · Bunch/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Austin Herron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · Bunch/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Damon Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-5
W
2026-06-13 · Bunch/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Austin Herron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wenzell
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-14 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Shults-kumar
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · Thacker/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Pencarinha
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · Thacker/META · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-31 · Thacker-Zhang/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wenzell
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-30 · Thacker/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Jilton
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.6% of games
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 21.5% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.9% of games
3.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert