Clay Johnson
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
42 matches · 31W–11L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history42 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
78.8%
26W–7L · 60.4% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
13 matches
Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.