← Search

Nancy Draughon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
DURHAM, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
299 matches · 222W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history299 matches
W
2026-09-29 · NDraughon.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eleanor Hoover
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-28 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Ellis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-28 · TOC.Powell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dell Pinkston
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-27 · NDraughon.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Werner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · NDraughon.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Rosplock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-24 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Smyth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
Default
2026-09-20 · MParker.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Smyth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-19 · EHoover-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Parker championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-19 · EHoover-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Parker championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-17 · EHoover-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Parker championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Sweigart mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Saccoccio mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.3% of games
3.5
85.6%
89W–15L · 63.4% of games
4.0
59.1%
39W–27L · 51.7% of games
6.5
95.2%
20W–1L · 63.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.8% of games
7.5
70.1%
47W–20L · 56% of games
3.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
106 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
74 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams