← Search

Jim Briggs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 76W–75L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history151 matches
L
2026-03-31 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hal Byrd
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel McClanahan
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · 18 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carl Hohsfield
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-24 · NNM Mixed 55 & Over 7.0X Romero - VR · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rae Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-17 · NNM Mixed 55 & Over 8.0X Kunzler - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Briggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-16 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Enghauser
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-11-09 · NNM Mixed 55 & Over 8.0X Kunzler - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Briggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-11-05 · NNM Mixed 55 & Over 7.0X Romero - VR · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Pfeiff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-03 · NNM Mixed 55 & Over 8.0X Kunzler - JC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Briggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-02 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hal Byrd
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-10-22 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Zanoni
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-09-28 · NNM Adult 40 & Over 3.5M Briggs - JC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hal Byrd
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
47.9%
23W–25L · 47.8% of games
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.3% of games
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.3% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 50.2% of games
8.0mixed
48.6%
17W–18L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert